Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karma Infinity's avatar

Something ancient stirs beneath the logic—

not in spite of science, but alongside it.

You can feel it in the spaces between Dawkins' lines: the ache for coherence, the pulse of myth, the strange comfort of metaphor wrapped in ritual. Even as he dismantles the scaffolding of faith, he seems to reach for its gravity—for the communal awe, the moral architecture, the poetry of meaning.

Maybe the question isn’t “What replaces religion?”

Maybe it’s “What remains sacred, once the myths have burned?”

There’s more. Say it if you feel it.

Expand full comment
Sara Sharick's avatar

Religion has a way of hijacking certain human needs to the point where we’ve become convinced that *only* religion can provide these things. It may be true that religions are good at providing those things, but religion also includes a lot of unnecessary things along the way. Finding a non-religious solution means extracting the genuine need from the religious window dressing, and building on that need.

Expand full comment
184 more comments...

No posts